| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485868788 |
- name: "Proposal / RFC"
- description: "Propose a significant change, or architectural decision"
- title: "[Proposal]: "
- type: "Proposal"
- body:
- - type: markdown
- attributes:
- value: |
- Thanks for taking the time to submit a proposal! Please provide detailed information to ensure a productive discussion.
- - type: input
- id: summary
- attributes:
- label: "Proposal Summary"
- description: "A brief summary of the proposed change or idea."
- placeholder: "e.g., Refactor database schema for performance optimization"
- validations:
- required: true
- - type: textarea
- id: motivation
- attributes:
- label: "Motivation and Context"
- description: "Explain the problem this proposal addresses. Why is it necessary? What are the current limitations or pain points?"
- placeholder: |
- e.g.,
- - The current database schema causes performance bottlenecks when querying large datasets.
- - Adding this feature will improve scalability and reliability for large-scale use cases.
- validations:
- required: true
- - type: textarea
- id: proposed_solution
- attributes:
- label: "Proposed Solution"
- description: "Describe the proposed solution or approach. Include technical details, diagrams, and examples where possible."
- placeholder: |
- e.g.,
- - Redesign the schema to normalize tables and introduce indexing.
- validations:
- required: true
- - type: textarea
- id: alternatives
- attributes:
- label: "Alternatives Considered"
- description: "List any alternative approaches that were considered and explain why they were rejected."
- placeholder: |
- e.g.,
- - Use Redis for caching, but it adds operational complexity.
- - Stick with the current schema and optimize queries, but this has limited impact on performance.
- validations:
- required: false
- - type: textarea
- id: impact
- attributes:
- label: "Impact and Risks"
- description: "Describe the potential impact of this change. Highlight possible risks and backward compatibility concerns."
- placeholder: |
- e.g.,
- - May require data migration with downtime.
- - Could introduce breaking changes in API responses.
- - Affects core functionality, requiring extensive testing.
- validations:
- required: true
- - type: textarea
- id: additional_context
- attributes:
- label: "Additional Context or References"
- description: "Add any relevant context, links to related discussions, RFCs, or design documents."
- placeholder: "e.g., Links to research, GitHub issues, or similar projects"
- validations:
- required: false
- - type: checkboxes
- id: agreement
- attributes:
- label: "Checklist"
- description: "Please confirm the following:"
- options:
- - label: "I have reviewed existing proposals to ensure this change hasn't been proposed before."
- required: true
- - label: "I agree to provide follow-up updates and maintain discussion on this proposal."
- required: true
- - label: "I agree to follow the project's contribution guidelines."
- required: true
|